Marketing To Teens: Avoiding Health Or Warning Letters

Puff Bar

Marketing To Teens: Avoiding Health Or Warning Letters

A secretive e cigarette company which has captured millions of dollars in profits annually by exploiting a loophole has said it really is temporarily suspending sales in the U.S. till further notice. However, despite the news, the business’s website still lists other countries where the product can be acquired. The company, based in Canada, markets Puff Bar as an electronic cigarette which you can use as being a regular cigarette. The only real difference is that whenever you light up Puff Bar, it mimics the appearance and feel of a real cigarette. In fact, some consumers have compared the puffing action of the product compared to that of a cigarette, and smokers around the globe have embraced the new product with both of your hands.

The Puff Bar was launched in Canada in January, with plans to enter other countries shortly. In spite of the recent launch, the website still lists several countries where the product is not available. On the list of countries list may be the U.S., where the product is specifically directed at younger consumers. The U.S. is not the only country where in fact the Puff Bar cannot currently be purchased. In line with the website, you can find no plans to release the product in the U.S., though it remains the goal of the business to make the product obtainable in the U.S.

An organization representative in Canada told Canadian television station CPolitics that there was “no immediate plan” to market the Puff Bar in the U.S. She denied reports in the media that the business was considering bringing the product to the American market, and instead referred all inquiries to the European company’s home country. The representative didn’t mention the loophole that allowed the merchandise to be sold in Europe, or the possibility that the loophole had been discovered before the product premiered in Canada. The U.S. patent office has ordered the trademark to be granted to the two names used to create the e cigarette, which are Smaxx and Vapro. Because the Puff Bar is still illegal in the U.S., it can be problematic for manufacturers to ship their products into the country.

There are a few arguments against allowing flavored e cigarettes in the U.S. Many public health experts fear that flavored the Cigs contain a level of nicotine that is too high to be healthy. They also fear that children may be enticed to smoke with flavors that appeal to their more sensitive psychological needs. One reason that the U.S. patent office has allowed the Puff Bar to be sold in Canada is because of its safety. The product is regulated by Canadian law and is required to meet standard quality controls.

The Puff Bar also is apparently safer than its pre-filled counterparts. It does not contain any nicotine and only contains a little bit of propylene glycol, an ingredient that is commonly used to promote cleanliness and prevent greasy foods from spreading. The propylene glycol in the Puff Bar also serves to help make the product attractive to younger consumers, as it tastes good.

Like Puff Bar all vaporizers, the Puff Bar also allows users to remove nicotine without using real tobacco. The ingredients in puffs make sure that there is no contact between the smoker’s mouth and the merchandise, thus eliminating the chance for nicotine to be absorbed through your skin. Unlike a traditional cigarette, the user does not have to carry the Puff Bar set up. With the puff bar, the complete surface of the device is covered with heat-sensitive material, which means that the Puff Bar does not emit smoke.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration remain examining the Puff Bar to find out whether or not it takes its hazard to public health. This loophole in international patent law allows manufactures to market their products based on names that do not represent any health dangers, such as for example “The Puff”. The loophole in U.S. patent law allows manufacturers to capitalize on potential names that sound much like well-known brands without developing a public health risk. For example, one company has trademarked the word “Candy” and developed several variations of its product, including bag of chips and mixed bag candy bar. The lack of health or trademark significance does not appear to have hindered the company from selling these products to the general public.

The lack of health or warning letters on all the major tobacco products may help contribute to the current wave of youth smoking that began in the U.S. However, many teens have considered electronic cigarettes as a healthier solution to enjoy their daily dose of nicotine. As a way to reduce the appeal of the puff bar to teens, manufacturers should include more health-related language on the marketing materials.